Model Peningkatan Peran Widyaiswara pada Corporate University di Lembaga Adminsitrasi Negara: Sebuah Pendekatan Soft System

Main Article Content

Basseng

Abstract

Masalah pokok dalam penelitian ini adalah sistem peningkatan peran widyaiswara dalam membangun Corporate  University pada sektor publik, dengan memilih Lembaga Administrasi Negara (LAN) sebagai lokus penelitian. Widyaiswara adalah jabatan fungsional yang memiliki potensi besar untuk dimanfaatkan dalam membangun Corporate University (Corpu). Metode penelitian Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) dipilih untuk mengungkapkan realitas dan aktualitas peran widyaiswara LAN pada Corpu LAN selama ini, sebagai dasar untuk mengonstruksi sebuah model konseptual peningkatan peran widyaiswara LAN pada Corpu LAN ke depan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model peran widyaiswara LAN pada Corpu LAN saat ini masih perlu dikembangkan agar dapat lebih optimal berkontribusi terhadap Corpu LAN. Untuk itu, penelitian ini mengonstruksi sebuah model konseptual peningkatan peran widyaiswara LAN pada Corpu LAN. Model konseptual ini berisikan delapan kegiatan yang akan dilaksanakan dalam bentuk squad team dengan pejabat fungsional lainnya yang dipimpin oleh pimpinan unit kerja. Model konseptual ini dapat berjalan dengan baik apabila ditopang oleh dimensi soft system dimana widyaiswara LAN terlebih dahulu perlu membangun mindsetnya agar bisa mengapresiasi Corpu LAN, mau bekerja secara sungguh, dan mau “berkorban” untuk Corpu LAN.
Kata Kunci: sistem, peran widyaiswara, model konseptual, corporate university, soft systems

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Allen, M. 2022. The Corporate University Handbook: Designing, Managing, and Growing A Successful Program. AMACOM

Checkland, Peter dan Jim Scholes. 1990.Soft Systems Methodology in Action, New York: John Wiley and Sons,

Checkland, Peter dan John Poulter. (2006).Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and Its use for Practicioners, Teachers and Students. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

Checkland, Peter. 1999. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: Includes a 30-year retrospective. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons

Creswell, John W. 1994. Desain Penelitian, Pendekatan Kualittatif & Kuantitatif (terjemahan). Jakarta: Penerbit KIK Press.

Drucker, Peter F. 1959. The Landmark of Tomorrow. New York: Harper and Brother.

Drucker, Peter F. (1959). The Landmark of Tomorrow. New York: Harper and Brother.

Elkeles, T dan Phillips JJ 2007 The chief learning officer: driving value within a changing organization through learning and development, Improving human performance series. Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam; Boston

Goldstein, James C. 2024. Leveraging The Corporate University Model to Develop and Deliver Customized Course Content. New York: Departement of Accounting Kanisius University.

Karpov, V. Andrey dan Zinaida M Karpova. 2022. Corporate University as a Business Accelarator in the Field of Education. Switzerland: MDPI Basel.

KirkPatrick, Donald L. 1998. Evaluating Training Porograms: The Four Levels. San Fransico Califf: Berret Koehler Publishers

Lytovchenko, Iryna dan Olena Agionko. 2017. Use of Project-Based Learning of Adults at Corporate Universities in The US and Canada (Journal of Intercultural Management). National Technical University of Ukraine.

Lytovchenko, iryna. (2016). Corporate University as A Form of Employee Training and Development in American Companies. Ukraine: National Technical University of Ukraine.

Maani, Kambiz E. dan Robert. Cavana 2000. Systems Thinking Modelling. Auckland: Prentice Hall.

Mintzberg, Henry. 1993. The Structure in Five. Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall

Nguyen, Hai Long dan Pengda Fan. 2022 . CEO Education and Firm Performance: Evidence from Corporate Universities. Japan: College of International Management.

Nonaka, Ikujiro dan R. Toyama. 2005. The Theory of the knowledge creating firm: subjectivity, objecitivy and synthesis, Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 14. Hal. 419 – 436.

Senge, Peter. 1990). The Fifth Discipline, The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.

Singh V, Verma S, Chaurasia SS. 2020 Mapping the themes and intellectual structure of corporate university: co-citation and cluster analyses. Sciento metrics 122:1275–1302

Tedlock, Barbara. 2005. The Observation of Participation and The Emergence of Public Ethnography.(dalam Norman K Denzim dan YVonna S Lincoln. California: The Sage Publication,

Thompson, G. 2000. Unfulfilled prophecy: The evolution of corporate colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(3), 322-41.

Tuomi, Ikka. 1999. Corporate Knowledge.,Helsinki: Metaxis.