Pengaruh Karakteristik Peserta dan Kompetensi Widyaiswara Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Pelatihan Revolusi Mental untuk Pelayanan Publik

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 12, 2019
https://doi.org/10.32834/jpap.v1i1.57
Download
PDF PDF
Statistic
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Maret

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Arfah Salwah
Pusat Pelatihan dan Pengembangan dan Kajian Hukum Administrasi Negara Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Abstract

The mental revolution training aims to produce apparatuses who have good mental and moral qualities. However, the result of the training evaluation shows that only 60 percent of the 100 participants graduated during training in 2017 conducted by  PKP2A IV LAN. This achievement is far from the average of the other training result that have average 90 percent. Two factors are believed to influence the result, namely the characteristics of participants and the competence of the trainer (widyaiswara). Therefore, this study aims to estimate the effect of participant characteristics and trainer’s competencies on participants' learning outcomes. A total of 50 participants became samples. This study uses multiple linear regression analysis. The results shows that the characteristics of participants and widyaiswara competencies have a significant simultaneous effect  on the learning outcomes for mental revolution training participants in PKP2A IV LAN. However, in a partial test, trainer’s competency has no significant effect. The characteristic coefficient is 0.342, meaning that if the respondent's characteristics increase by 1 point, the learning outcomes will increase by 0.342 times or 34.2% assuming other variables constant. Therefore, improving the quality and number of training outcome can be triggered by setting the participant’s characteristics.Keywords:participant characteristic, trainer competency, training outcome

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Azman, N., & Ali, M. 2015. The Effect of Finance, Infrastructure and Training on the Performance of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs). 5 (3): 421–452. http://doi.org/10.12691/jbms-4-1-1.
  2. Dachner, A. M., & Saxton, B. M. 2014. If You Don’t Care, Then Why Should I? The Influence of Instructor Commitment on Student Satisfaction and Commitment: http://doi.org/10.1177/1052562914555550.
  3. Hamzah. 2017. Kompetensi Widyaiswara Dan Kualitas Diklat. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pembelajaran. 1 (2).
  4. John, W. Santrock. 2008. Psikologi Pendidikan (Educational Psychology), Edisi 3 Buku 1, Salemba Humanika, Jakarta.
  5. Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Azasi Manusia. 2014. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jakarta.
  6. Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Azasi Manusia. 2016. Instruksi Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2016 Tentang Gerakan Nasional Revolusi Mental. Jakarta.
  7. Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia. 2008. Sistem adiministrasi Negara RI, Toko Gunung Agung, Jakarta.
  8. Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia. 2017. Peraturan Kepala Lembaga Administrasi Negara Nomor 7 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Revolusi Mental Untuk Pelayanan Publik. LAN, Jakarta.
  9. Makmun, A.S. 2007. Psikologi Kependidikan, Perangkat Sistem Pengajaran Modul, Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
  10. Partk, S., dan Chae, C. 2017. Intervention Reserach and it’s Influence on Nonintervention Reserach in Human Resource Development. European Journal of Training and Development. http://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-08-2016-0062.
  11. Seiberling, C., dan Kauffeld, S. 2017. Volition to Transfer: Mastering Obstacles in Training Transfer. Personnel Review, 46 (4): 809-823. http://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2015-0202.
  12. Towler, A. 2009. Effects of Trainer Expressiveness, Seductive Details, and Trainee Goal Orientation on Training Outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20 (1): 65-84. http://doi.org/1002/HRDQ.20008.