Inclusive Leadership and Bureaucratic Reform for Local Government Resilience: A Study of Women’s Economic Empowerment and MSMEs in Special Region of Yogyakarta

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 16, 2025
https://doi.org/10.32834/jpap.v7i2.1002
Download
pdf
Statistic
Vol 7, No 2 (2025): September

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nurliah Nurdin
Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
Retnayu Prasetyanti
Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
Rindri Andewi Gati
Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
Risky Yustiani Posumah
Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta
Suci Nur Oktavia
Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta

Abstract

The goal of Indonesia's decentralised governance reforms was to make local communities more resilient and inclusive by making leadership more democratic and changing the way the government works. However, even after more than 20 years of restructuring, many local governments continue to struggle with adapting and incorporating women, particularly when it comes to supporting women-run micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). This study analyzes the interplay between inclusive leadership and bureaucratic reform in influencing the resilience of local governance in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY), a province recognized for its political stability within an asymmetric decentralization framework. This research is using qualitative-descriptive method that combines document analysis, policy review, and secondary data triangulation. Our studies shows that Yogyakarta's stability has helped keep the government running smoothly, but it has also caused bureaucratic inertia that makes it harder to be more open and innovative. While the region's government talks a lot about participatory decision-making, openness, and accessibility that are mostly just words and not real policies.  From the findings, we suggests a framework that connects the inclusive leadership and resilient governance. It emphasises the need for gender-responsive policy co-creation, inclusive budgeting, and participatory mechanisms. It is to give women-owned MSMEs more power.  It also requiring "Inclusivity Impact Assessments," setting up a Resilient Support Unit, and making shared decision-making structures a part of the bureaucracy. The overall findings contribute to the discourse on how making governance more inclusive can help transform political stability into genuine adaptive resilience.
Keywords: Inclusive leadership, bureaucratic reform, resilient governance, women’s empowerment, MSMEs, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Aipassa, R. C. (2025). Menelaah Penghapusan Piutang Macet Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM) oleh Pemerintah. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil-suluttenggomalut/baca-artikel/17697/Menelaah-Penghapusan-Piutang-Macet-Usaha-Mikro-Kecil-dan-Menengah-UMKM-oleh-Pemerintah.html
  2. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford University Press.
  3. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
  4. APEC. (2024). PNM Mekaar: Empowering Women Entrepreneurs through Microfinance Innovation. APEC Secretariat.
  5. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2022). Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Indonesia: A Review of Progress and Challenges. Manila: ADB Publications.
  6. Boin, A., & Lodge, M. (2016). Designing resilient institutions for transboundary crisis management. Public Administration, 94(2), 289–305.
  7. Brunner, S., & Lynch, A. (2021). Adaptive governance for climate-resilient institutions. Environmental Politics, 30(5), 785–804.
  8. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
  9. Choi, S., Tran, T. A., & Park, B. I. (2017). Inclusive innovation in public administration. Public Management Review, 19(2), 209–226.
  10. Dinas Koperasi dan UKM Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (2024). Laporan Tahunan Pemberdayaan UMKM 2021–2024.Yogyakarta: Pemerintah Daerah DIY.
  11. Dinas Koperasi dan UMKM DIY. (2024). Rancangan Akhir Perubahan Renstra: Rencana Strategis 2022–2027.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wrABzfAd0iyQUuYXdLK7TT-58RQN2PuQ/view
  12. Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (2024). Data Anggota DPRD DIY Periode 2024–2029. Yogyakarta: DPRD DIY.
  13. Duit, A., Galaz, V., Eckerberg, K., & Ebbesson, J. (2010). Governance, complexity, and resilience. Global Environmental Change, 20(3), 363–368.
  14. Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
  15. Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
  16. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.
  17. Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia. (2021). Profil Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM) Indonesia. Jakarta: KemenKopUKM.
  18. Kemenkeu RI. (2024). Tujuh Tahun Mendukung Usaha Mikro Bertumbuh: Evaluasi dan Tantangan.https://pip.kemenkeu.go.id/berita/142/tujuh-tahun-mendukung-usaha-mikro-bertumbuh-evaluasi-dan-tantangan?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  19. Kemenpan RB. (2024). Kominfo Targetkan 30 Juta UMKM Adopsi Teknologi Digital pada 2024.https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/berita-daerah/kominfo-targetkan-30-juta-umkm-adopsi-teknologi-digital-pada-2024?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  20. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Ministry of Investment. (2024). OSS Service and Investment Data Report 2024. Jakarta: BKPM.
  22. Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
  23. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  24. Nugroho, A. (2024). UMKM Hadapi Tantangan Kegagalan Produk, Risiko Kredit, dan Persaingan. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/umkm-hadapi-tantangan-kegagalan-produk-risiko-kredit-dan-persaingan/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  25. OECD. (2021). Building Resilient Public Institutions for the Future. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3bcbdd2e-en
  26. OECD. (2021). Gender Equality and Public Sector Resilience. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  27. Pulse Lab Jakarta & UN Women. (2022). Breaking Growth Barriers for Women Impact Entrepreneurs in Indonesia. UN Women Publications.
  28. Respati, A. R., & Sukmana, Y. (2022). Kemenkop-UKM Bidik 5,8 Juta UMKM pada 2024. Kompas.com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2022/11/01/193300226/kemenkop-ukm-bidik-5-8-juta-umkm-masuk-ekosistem-digital-pada-2024?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  29. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24351856
  30. Sabharwal, M., Levine, H., & D’Agostino, M. (2019). A conceptual framework for inclusive public leadership. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(2), 248–270.
  31. Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Theoretical development and practical implications. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(6), 720–734.
  32. Susanti, S. D. (2023). Kemenkop UKM Targetkan 30 Juta Pelaku UMKM Terdigitalisasi di 2024. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3421920/kemenkop-ukm-targetkan-30-juta-pelaku-umkm-terdigitalisasi-di-2024?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  33. Tempo. (2025). 69,5 Persen Pelaku UMKM Tidak Punya Akses Kredit Perbankan. Tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/69-5-persen-pelaku-umkm-tidak-punya-akses-kredit-perbankan-1533900?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  34. UNDP. (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
  35. UNDP. (2022). Gender Equality in Public Administration (GEPA) Report. New York: UNDP.
  36. UNDP. (2023). Resilience Building in Governance Systems: A Framework for Adaptive Institutions. New York: UNDP.
  37. UN Women & Pulse Lab Jakarta. (2022). Breaking Growth Barriers for Women Impact Entrepreneurs in Indonesia.Jakarta: UN Women.
  38. Women’s World Banking. (2023). Financial Inclusion and Gendered Access to Capital in Southeast Asia. New York: WWB.
  39. World Bank. (1992). Governance and Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  40. World Bank. (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  41. World Bank. (2023). Gender and Governance: Enhancing Women’s Voice in Public Administration. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  42. World Bank. (2023). Indonesia: Expanding Women’s Access to Microfinance through the UMi Program. World Bank Policy Note.