Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 17, 2023
Published
November 17, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 162 Download : 225

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to find out how the implementation of the Automatic Adjustment policy is carried out at BAPETEN, which is a non-ministerial institution categorized as a small budget ceiling, but has the task of meeting the 2019-2024 RPJMN target in the context of nuclear power supervision. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data collection was carried out through data analysis and data documents from the business intelligence of the Directorate General of Budget of the Ministry of Finance, Work Plan documents on KRISNA and interviews with the BAPETEN Planning Bureau. The results of this study indicate that APBN funding for BAPETEN in the budget document has a very unequal proportion which causes funding flexibility to be very limited in meeting performance targets, especially the target of fostering, licensing, and supervising nuclear power in health, research, education and industrial facilities to realize security and safety guarantees for the use of nuclear power in the community. The process of determining the amount of budget that is given an automatic adjustment block is carried out in a mixture of top down and bottom up. Priority scale is the main consideration when determining activities that will be reduced and goods expenditure is the type of expenditure that is most affected by the cutting policy. The impact of automatic adjustment is that it causes the budget to be increasingly minimal so that the RPJMN target for five years from 2020 to 2024 is never achieved. Policy making requires caution in formulating which ones need to be taken by considering the pros and cons to maintain optimal organizational goals.
Keywords: automatic adjustment, budget, nuclear budget

Article Details

References

  1. Bratton, Michael. 2013. "Measuring Government Performance in Public Opinion Surveys in Africa: Towards Experiments?". Wider Working Paper No. 2013/023 1-23.
  2. Curristine, Teresa. 2005. "Government Performance: Lessons and Challenges". OECD Journal on Budgeting Vol. 5, No.1 127-151.
  3. Habibah, Siti. 2017. Analysis of the Impact of Budget Cuts on the Performance of Ministries / Institutions: Study on the Ministry of Agriculture. Accounting and Business Information System Journal Vol 6, No 1 (2018).
  4. Halim, Abdul and Muhammad Syam Kusufi. 2014. Theory, Concepts, and Applications of Public Sector Accounting: from Budget Up to Financial Statements, from Government to Places of Worship. 2nd Edition. Jakarta: Four Salemba.
  5. Levasseur, Karine and Andrea Rounce. 2015. "Public Policy and Operational Alignment in Light of Public Service Retrenchment-Lessons Learned from Canada". International Review of Administrative Sciences 0 (0) 1-20.
  6. Law Number 17 of 2003 concerning "State Finance".
  7. Martoyo, B., Pusat Riset Arkeologi Prasejarah dan Sejarah BRIN, A., Heru Erwantoro Pusat Riset Arkeologi Prasejarah dan Sejarah BRIN, I., Luki Karunia Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta, I. R., Alamsyah STAI DDI Sidenreng Rappang, I., & Fakhry Amin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Enam Enam Kendari, I. (n.d.). Keeping Bung Hatta’s Idea: Cooperatives for Social and Economic Development.
  8. Ministry of Finance. 2022. Letter Number S-1088/MK.02/2021 dated November 29, 2021 regarding automatic adjustment of Expenditures of Ministries/Institutions for Fiscal Year 2022.
  9. Ministry of Finance. 2022. Letter Number S-458/MK.02/2022 dated May 23, 2022 regarding the addition of automatic adjustment of Expenditures o Ministries/Institutions for Fiscal Year 2022.
  10. Medium-term Development Plan 2020-2024. Ministry of National Planning and Development.
  11. Istania, R (2023) Territorial Change and Conflict in Indonesia: Confronting the Fear of Secession, Routledge.
  12. Silitonga, M. S., Anthonio, G., Heyse, L., & Wittek, R. (2015). Institutional change and corruption of public leaders: A social capital perspective on Indonesia. In Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia (pp. 233–258). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22434-3_9
  13. Silitonga, M. S., Wittek, R., Snijders, T. A. B., & Heyse, L. (2023). Democratizing corruption: a role structure analysis of Indonesia’s “Big Bang” decentralization. Applied Network Science, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-023-00535-w
  14. Suryanto, A., Nurdin, N., Irawati, E., & Andriansyah. (2023). Digital transformation in enhancing knowledge acquisition of public sector employees. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.11.011
  15. Yudha Perdana Putra (2021). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Budget Performance in the Implementation Aspect of the BPKP Ri Scope Work Unit: A Comparative Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Budget and State Finance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.33827/akurasi2021.vol3.iss2.art122.
  16. https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/4964/optimis-ekonomi-tetap-tumbuh-positif-di-tahun-2023-pemerintah-dorong-pemanfaatan-bonus-demografi-dan pengendalian-inflasi
  17. https:// www.voaindonesia.com/a/negara-eropa-terkena-dampak-penyetopan-gas-rusia-/6629679.html