Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 8, 2025
Published
October 8, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 19 Download : 8

Main Article Content

Abstract

Transformasi manajemen sumber daya manusia di institusi kepolisian menjadi krusial dalam rangka mewujudkan visi Indonesia Emas 2045. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis efektivitas penunjukan mentor dalam Program Manajemen Talenta Polri (MTP), khususnya terkait kesesuaian kompetensi antara mentor dan Talenta serta implikasinya terhadap pengembangan personel unggul. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dan studi kasus instrumental, data diperoleh melalui telaah dokumen internal SSDM Polri serta literatur akademik terkini. Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa penunjukan mentor masih dominan berbasis senioritas dan jabatan, belum mempertimbangkan kecocokan peran, pengalaman teknis, serta nilai-nilai profesional yang dibutuhkan mentee. Kondisi ini menghambat efektivitas mentoring sebagai proses pembelajaran yang transformatif, baik dalam aspek karier maupun psikososial. Dengan mengacu pada teori Person–Environment Fit dan pendekatan humanistic mentoring, penelitian ini merekomendasikan reformulasi kebijakan penunjukan mentor berbasis kompetensi, pelatihan berkelanjutan bagi mentor, serta penguatan sistem evaluasi relasional dan kontekstual. Temuan ini diharapkan menjadi kontribusi nyata dalam menciptakan kultur pembinaan SDM Polri yang lebih adaptif, empatik, dan berkelanjutan menuju kepemimpinan strategis masa depan.
Kata kunci: manajemen talenta; mentoring; Polri; pengembangan SDM; person–environment fit; humanisasi pembinaan

Article Details

References

  1. Allen, T. D., & Poteet, M. L. (2011). Enhancing Our Knowledge of Mentoring With a Person-Centric Approach. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01310.x
  2. Baral, N., Cerveny, L. K., Penaluna, B. E., Roper, B. B., Shively, D., & Witt, S. (2024). Variations in Mentorship Across Grade Levels and Career Stages Among Public Management Professionals. Public Personnel Management, 53(2), 226–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260231196570
  3. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  4. Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern?based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
  6. Chen, Y.-C., & Chai, C.-C. (2023). Development of a two-way mentorship scale focusing on next-generation core competencies. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 629. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02093-z
  7. De Cooman, R., & Vleugels, W. (2022). Person–Environment Fit: Theoretical Perspectives, Conceptualizations, and Outcomes. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.377
  8. Hryshchenko, M., Artemchuk, M., Zavhorodnya, L., Tymoshenko, Y., & Purhani, S. (2025). The role of mentoring in the employee professional development and career growth. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(1), e25004. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v6i1.888
  9. IM, T., & Cha, S. (2024). The Hierarchy-Oriented Bureaucracy of South Korea: A Type of Neo-Weberian State? Journal of Policy Studies, 39(2), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.52372/jps39205
  10. Ingham, J. (2006). Fast, effective training at Meteor. Strategic HR Review, 5(3), 4–4. https://doi.org/10.1108/14754390680000868
  11. Kementerian PAN-RB. (2020). Peraturan Menteri PAN-RB Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Sistem Merit Berbasis Kualifikasi, Kompetensi, dan Kinerja. Kementerian PAN-RB.
  12. Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL.
  13. Kristof?Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of Individuals’ Fit at Work: a Meta-Analysis of Person-Job, Person-Organization, Person-Group, and Person-Supervisor Fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
  14. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147 1767(85)90062 8
  15. Mutale, W., Nzala, S. H., Martin, M. H., Rose, E. S., Heimburger, D. C., & Goma, F. M. (2023). Accelerating Organizational Change to Build Mentorship Culture in Zambian Universities. Annals of Global Health, 89(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4032
  16. Pella, D. A., & Inayati, A. (2011). Talent management: Mengembangkan SDM untuk mencapai pertumbuhan dan kinerja prima. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  17. Polri. (2019). Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 3 Tahun 2019 tentang Manajemen Talenta Polri. Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
  18. Ragins, B., & Kram, K. (2008). The Handbook of Mentoring at Work: Theory, Research, and Practice. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976619
  19. Semaihi, S. O., Ahmad, S. Z., & Khalid, K. (2023). Talent management and performance in the public sector: the mediating role of line managerial support. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 10(4), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-09-2022-0274
  20. SSDM Polri. (2022). Analisa Evaluasi Manajemen Talenta Polri Nomor: B/ND-712/VII/KEP/2022/ROJIASNSTRA.
  21. SSDM Polri. (2023a). Laporan Evaluasi Program MTP 2022–2023.
  22. SSDM Polri. (2023b). Laporan hasil analisa dan evaluasi kegiatan supervisi Manajemen Talenta Polri T.A. 2023 (Surat B/ND-20/IV/KEP./2023/Bagmutjab).
  23. SSDM Polri. (2023c). Notulen Forum MTP SSDM Polri.
  24. SSDM Polri. (2023d). Penetapan Talenta dan Penunjukan Mentor (ST/1925/VIII/KEP./2023).
  25. Stake, R. E. (2020). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
  26. Taylor, S. N., Passarelli, A. M., & Van Oosten, E. B. (2019). Leadership coach effectiveness as fostering self-determined, sustained change. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(6), 101313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101313
  27. Wijayanti, L. (2021). Efektivitas mentoring dalam akselerasi kepemimpinan di lembaga penegakan hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Kepemimpinan (2nd ed., Vol. 5).
  28. Woods, C. S., & Preciado, M. (2016). Student–Mentor Relationships and Students’ College Attitudes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 21(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2015.1127767
  29. Wulf, K., Borges, N., Huggett, K., Blanco, M., Binkley, P., Moore-Clingenpeel, M., & Hurtubise, L. (2021). Personality Compatibility Within Faculty Mentoring Dyads and Perceived Mentoring Outcomes: Survey Results of Academic Medicine Institutions in the USA. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01191-w
  30. Yusuf, R. R., Supriyono, B., Nuh, M., & Wanto, A. H. (2025). Analyzing the Critical Factors for Talent Management Implementation in the Public Sector. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Public Administration and Governance, ICOPAG 2024, 30 October 2024, Malang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2024.2354826