Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 12, 2018
Published
November 12, 2018
Download
Unduh
Statistic
Read Counter : 391 Download : 214

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of the effectiveness of public accountability achievement of government institution and organizational resource management on the level of success in achieving the performance of the organization or government agency. The hypothesis of this research is there is a positive influence between the effectiveness of achieving public accountability and the effectiveness of resource management on high performing organizations in the cilacap regency government. data analysis techniques use simple linear regression and multiple linear regression. hypothesis test using formula F and coefficient of determination. The results showed there is a positive influence between the effectiveness of public accountability achievement and effectiveness of resource management to high performance organizations in government of Cilacap regency, Recommendations of research are: Improvement of organization performance is done through intensive supervision from OPD leader related to execution of duty and function of OPD.The setting of realistic and objective target indicators; increase self-belonging and responsibility from the member of organizations.Keywords: organization’s performance, public accountability, resource management.

Article Details

References

  1. Asman, Ismail. Penilaian Kinerja Organisasi Publik. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, vol 05, No. 3. tahun 2014.
  2. Bernandin and Russel. 2001. Government Performance Assessment. Boston. University Press.
  3. Boncondin. 2007. Peningkatan Akuntabilitas Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jogjakarta. Bina Aksara.
  4. Frederich, Carl J. 2007. Implementing Public Policy and Government Performance. Cambridge. Brighton.
  5. Caiden, Gerald E. 1991. Administrative Reform Comes of Age. London. Cambridge University.
  6. Effendi, Sofian dan Masri Singarimbun. 2001. Metode Penelitian Survei. Edisi ketiga. Jakarta. LP3ES.
  7. Gomes, Faustino Cardoso. 2001. How to Assess Performance, Apllied to Goverment. University Press Boston
  8. Scott, James F. 2000. Increase Goverment Accountability. Oxford. Sage Publication.
  9. Mangkunegara. 2000. Teori Manajemen dan Aplikasinya. Jogjakarta. UII Press. Wijoyo, Renyo. 2010. Akuntansi Sektor Publik Organisasi Non Laba. Jakarta. Pustaka Jaya.
  10. Rasul, Syahrudin. 2003. Pengintegrasian Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja dan Anggaran dalam Perspektif UU NO. 17/2003 Tentang Keuangan Negara. Jakarta. PNRI
  11. Rivai, Achmad. 2004. Organisasi dan Kinerja Organisasi. Jakarta. Bina Pustaka.
  12. Siagian, Sondang P. 1994. Filasat Manajemen. Jakarta. Bina Aksara.
  13. ----------------------. 2001. Manajemen Stratejik. Jakarta. Bina Aksara.
  14. Sianipar. 1999. Manajemen Pemerintahan. Jogjakarta. Aksara Baru.
  15. Silalahi, Ulbert. 2003. Studi Tentang Ilmu Administrasi. Bandung. Alfabetta. Sukma, Deviani. 2013. Akuntabilitas Publik. Makalah Seminar yang diselenggarakan Universitas Parahiyangan Bandung, 11 Maret 2013.
  16. Wirawan. 2009. Pengembangan Organisasi, Pengukuran Kinerja. Jakarta. Bina Pustaka.
  17. Turner, Mark and Hulme, David. 1997. Governance, Administrasi, and Development: Making The State Work. London. MacMillan Press Ltd.
  19. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan
  20. Inpres No 7 tahun 1999 tentang Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah
  21. Perpres 29 tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Instansi Pemerintah
  22. Permenpan RB Nomor 11 tahun 2015 tentang Roadmap Reformasi Birokrasi Tahun 2015-2019. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), 2008
  23. pada Seminar Reformasi Birokrasi di Hotel Indonesia tanggal 3 Desember 2008.
  24. LKPJ Kabupaten Cilacap Tahun 2016