Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 24, 2024
Published
September 24, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 198 Download : 614

Main Article Content

Abstract

Daerah pedesaan sering kali diabaikan dalam kebijakan pembangunan, dan bagaimana upaya sebelumnya untuk mengalihkan kekuasaan ke tempat-tempat ini (melalui tata kelola pedesaan yang terdesentralisasi) sebagian besar gagal karena masalah seputar kurangnya transparansi, legitimasi, dan kepercayaan. Teknologi Blockchain disajikan sebagai solusi potensial dan kasus penggunaan yang diterapkan di daerah pedesaan, termasuk bagaimana DAO dapat digunakan dalam tata kelola pedesaan. Keterbatasan mengenai pengembangan dan adopsi teknologi baru ini juga diangkat dan didiskusikan. Karena ada permintaan untuk solusi terdesentralisasi tetapi kurangnya mekanisme yang tersedia, daerah pedesaan dapat dilihat sebagai skenario kasus terbaik yang tampaknya menjadi area utama bagi pengembang dan peneliti blockchain untuk menggunakan dan menerapkan Blockchain di pemerintahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potensi penggunaan blockchain dalam meningkatkan pembangunan desa. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan kapasitas kebijakan, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi potensi penggunaan blockchain. Hasilnya, peningkatan tata kelola pembangunan desa sangat dimungkinkan dengan blockchain. DAO dapat meningkatkan partisipasi dan transparansi masyarakat pada pembangunan desa. Dibutuhkan komitment pada proses optimalisasi penggunaan teknologi.
Kata Kunci: blockchain; pembangunan desa; desentralisasi; tata kelola partisipasi

Article Details

References

  1. Aujla, G. S., Singh, M., Bose, A., Kumar, N., Han, G., & ... (2020). Blocksdn: Blockchain-as-a-service for software defined networking in smart city applications. IEEE …. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9055743/
  2. Azmi, I. F., & Aji, A. (2023). Integritas?: Jurnal Antikorupsi Sistem anti-korupsi 4 . 0?: Adopsi teknologi blockchain di sektor publik. 9(1), 93–108.
  3. Casallas, T., Alexandra, J., Manuel, J., Molano, R., & Ignacio, J. (2020). Smart Contracts with Blockchain in the Public Sector. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 6(3), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.07.005
  4. Cha, J., Singh, S. K., Kim, T. W., & Park, J. H. (2021). Blockchain-empowered cloud architecture based on secret sharing for smart city. Journal of Information Security and …. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214212620308383
  5. Chambers, R. (2007). Innovations in rural extension. Review Literature And Arts Of The Americas, June, 2007–2007.
  6. De Souza, R. C., Luciano, E. M., & Wiedenhöft, G. C. (2018, May). The uses of the Blockchain Smart Contracts reduce the levels of corruption: Some preliminary thoughts. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209408
  7. Esposito, C., Ficco, M., & Gupta, B. B. (2021). Blockchain-based authentication and authorization for smart city applications. Information Processing & Management. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457320309584
  8. Gong, Q., Liu, C., & Wu, M. (2021). Does administrative decentralization enhance economic growth? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Economic Modelling, 94, 945–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.035
  9. Guo, J., Ding, X., & Wu, W. (2020). A blockchain-enabled ecosystem for distributed electricity trading in smart city. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9165852/
  10. Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C. M., Fabian, N. E., & Oehmichen, J. (2023). Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 162(March), 113777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777
  11. Huang, I. Y. F. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 through Government Initiatives and Collaborative Governance: The Taiwan Experience. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/PUAR.13239
  12. Iwandari, P., Isna, A., & Rosyadi, S. (2020). Proses Pemilihan Alternatif Kebijakan Daerah ( Studi Kasus tentang Komite Ekonomi Kreatif ). Ilmu Administrasi Negara (ASIAN).
  13. Khan, S. N., Shael, M., & Majdalawieh, M. (2019). Blockchain technology as a support infrastructure in E-Government evolution at Dubai economic department. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343147.3343164
  14. Koutsouris, A. (2010). The emergence of the intra-rural digital divide: A critical review of the adoption of ICTs in rural areas and the farming community. 9th European IFSA Symposium, July, 23–32.
  15. Li, S. (2018). Application of blockchain technology in smart city infrastructure. … International Conference on Smart Internet of Things …. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8465562/
  16. Livelihoods, S. R. (2011). Strengthening Rural Livelihoods. Strengthening Rural Livelihoods. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780440361
  17. Orecchini, F., Santiangeli, A., Zuccari, F., Pieroni, A., & ... (2018). Blockchain technology in smart city: A new opportunity for smart environment and smart mobility. … Conference on Intelligent …. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00979-3_36
  18. Pilkington, M., Crudu, R., & Grant, L. G. (2017). Blockchain and bitcoin as a way to lift a country out of poverty - Tourism 2.0 and e-governance in the Republic of Moldova. International Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, 7(2), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJITST.2017.087132
  19. Prasetyanti, R., & Nugroho, A. A. (2019). Governance Network in Sustainable Tourism Development: A case of thematic kampung tourism in Malang, Indonesia. 93(AICoBPA 2018), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.2991/aicobpa-18.2019.42
  20. Rozikin, M., Hesty, W., & Sulikah, S. (2020). Kolaborasi dan E-Literacy: Kunci Keberhasilan Inovasi E-Government Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 16(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i1.603
  21. Søholt, S., Stenbacka, S., & Nørgaard, H. (2018). Conditioned receptiveness: Nordic rural elite perceptions of immigrant contributions to local resilience. Journal of Rural Studies, 64(December 2017), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.05.004
  22. Stockburger, L., Kokosioulis, G., Mukkamala, A., Mukkamala, R. R., & Avital, M. (2021). Blockchain-enabled decentralized identity management: The case of self-sovereign identity in public transportation. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2(2), 100014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100014
  23. Subejo, S. (2006). Penyuluhan Pertanian Indonesia di Tengah Isu Desentralisasi, Privatisasi dan Demokratisasi. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.25015/penyuluhan.v2i2.2132
  24. Suryanto, A., & Nugroho, A. A. (2020). Improving Public Participation in Innovation Management of Village-Owned Enterprise: Lesson Learned From the Best Village-Owned Enterprise in Indonesia. PalArch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(4), 2072–2082.
  25. Tiwari, S., Lane, M., & Alam, K. (2019). Do social networking sites build and maintain social capital online in rural communities? Journal of Rural Studies, 66(January), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.029
  26. Treiblmaier, H., & Sillaber, C. (2020). A Case Study of Blockchain-Induced Digital Transformation in the Public Sector. 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44337-5_11
  27. Wahyudi, A. A., Widowati, Y. R., & Nugroho, A. A. (2022). STRATEGI IMPLEMENTASI SMART CITY KOTA BANDUNG. Jurnal Good Governance, 18(1).
  28. Zakirin, M., & Arifin, J. (2022). Evaluasi Kebijakan Dilihat Dari Aspek Dampak Program Keluarga Harapan (Pkh) Di Desa Hayaping Kecamatan Awang Kabupaten Barito Timur. Japb, 5(1), 256–271.
  29. Zheng, L., Batuo, M. E., & Shepherd, D. (2017). The Impact of Regional and Institutional Factors on Labor Productive Performance—Evidence from the Township and Village Enterprise Sector in China. World Development, 96, 591–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.006