Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 19, 2023
Published
October 19, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 592 Download : 408

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan desentralisasi dan inovasi daerah, dengan mengambil studi kasus inovasi pemerintah daerah di Kota Meksiko, Kabupaten Jembrana, dan Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat. Metode penelitian menggunakan studi literatur. Data Meksiko diambilkan dari hasil penelitian data sekunder dari 64 inovasi yang dilakukan pada 30 pemerintah daerah di Meksiko. Sedangkan data di Kabupaten Jembrana dan Pemerintah Provinsi Bali diambil dari penelitian terdahulu, jurnal dan sumber data sekunder lainnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa inovasi daerah tumbuh karena inisiasi mandiri inovator maupun sebagai respon atas permasalahan yang muncul dalam masyarakat. Inovasi daerah seringkali digunakan sebagai sarana politik pemimpin daerah. Kepemimpinan menentukan keberhasilan inovasi. Permasalahan yang muncul dalam inovasi daerah adalah keberlanjutan inovasi daerah. Saran yang diberikan diantaranya melalui pelembagaan inovasi secara formal, membangun transparansi dan akuntabilitas, membuka ruang partisipasi dan kolaborasi pada stakeholders yang lebih luas, memilih prioritas program yang relevan, serta membagi peran dan tanggungjawab kepada stakeholders dengan jelas dan akuntabel dalam memperkuat inovasi.
Kata Kunci: inovasi; reformasi birokrasi; pemerintah daerah; studi komparasi

Article Details

References

  1. Aiken, Michael; Bacharach, Samuel B.; French, J. Lawrence (1980). Organizational Structure, Work Process, and Proposal Making in Administrative Bureaucracies. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 631–652. doi:10.5465/255553
  2. Barras, R. (1986). ‘Towards a theory of innovation in services’. Research Policy, 15, 161–73.
  3. Barras, R. (1990). ‘Interactive innovation in financial and business services: the vanguard of the service revolution’. Research Policy, 19, 215–37.
  4. Chung, C. S., Choi, H., & Cho, Y. (2022). Analysis of Digital Governance Transition in South Korea: Focusing on the Leadership of the President for Government Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010002
  5. Damanpour, F. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). ‘The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations’. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 45–65.
  6. Be-ere, Seregious. 2021. Decentralization Reforms in Developing Countries Designed to Champion the Interests of Central Politicians and not Grassroots Development. Journal of Developing Societies 2021 38:1, 27-49
  7. De Vries, H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M. and Tummers, L.G. (2015), “Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda”, Public Administration, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 146-166.
  8. Dick-Sagoe, Christopher; Andraz, Jorge Miguel Lopo Gonçalves (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1804036–. doi:10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036
  9. Falagas, M. E., E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas. 2008. “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses.” The FASEB Journal 22 (2): 338–342.
  10. Grindle, Merilee S. 2007. Going Local : Decentralization, Democratization and the Promise of Good Governance. New Jersey : Princeton University Press
  11. Halvorsen, Thomas, et al. 2005. On the Differences between Public and Private Sector Innovations. Publin Report. Oslo
  12. Hansen, J.A. and Pihl-Thinvad, S. (2019), “Managing employee innovative behaviour through transformational and transactional leadership styles”, Public Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 918-944.
  13. Hartley, J., Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J. (2013), “Collaborative innovation: a viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 73 No. 6, pp. 821-830.
  14. Janssen, O. (2004), “How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 201-215
  15. Jaskyte, K. (2011), “Predictors of Administrative and technological innovations in nonprofit organizations”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 77-86.
  16. Kristina Jaskyte (2011). Predictors of Administrative and Technological Innovations in Nonprofit Organizations. , 71(1), 77–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02308.x
  17. Koleman S. Strumpf (2002). Does Government Decentralization Increase Policy Innovation?. , 4(2), 207–241. doi:10.1111/1467-9779.00096
  18. Nugroho, A. A. (2018). Pembangunan Ekonomi Berbasis Potensi Wilayah dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Analisis Pengembangan Ekonomi Kabupaten Ngawi. Jurnal Pembangunan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 8(2), 30–36.
  19. Nugroho, A.A., Rahayu, N.S., and Yusuf, RR. (2023). “The Role of e-Government to Improve the Implementation of Merit System in Indonesian Local Goverments” in The 4th International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science. KnE Life Sciences. pages 516–542. DOI 10.18502/kss.v8i11.13570
  20. O’Byrne, L., Miller, M., Douse, C., Venkatesh, R. and Kapucu, N. (2014), “Social innovation in the public sector: the case of Seoul metropolitan government”, Journal of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 53-71.
  21. Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc
  22. Oldham, G.R. and Cummings, A. (1996), “Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 607-634
  23. Pablo, A. L., Reay, T., Dewald, J. R. and Casebeer, A. L. (2007). ‘Identifying, enabling and managing dynamic capabilities in the public sector’. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 687–708.
  24. Prasojo, E., Kurniawan, T. Hasan, A. (2004). “Peran Kepemimpinan dalam Program Inovasi Daerah: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Jembrana”. Dalam Jurnal Bisnis & Birokrasi. Vol XII., No. 3 September 2004. Hal 52-60.
  25. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations 5th edition. New York: Free Press
  26. Rosen, H.S. 1999. Public Finance. Boston : McGraw-Hill
  27. Smith, B.C. 1985. Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  28. Supriyono, B. (2022). Otonomi Daerah dalam Masyarakat Multikultural. Dalam Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi Volume 2. No. 1. Hal 1-10.
  29. Vigoda-Gadot, E., Shoham, A., Schwabsky, N. and Ruvio, A. (2005), “Public sector innovation for the managerial and the post-managerial era: promises and realities in a globalizing public administration”, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 57-81.
  30. Walker, R. M. (2006). Innovation type and diffusion: an empirical analysis of local government. Public Administration, 84(2), 311–335.
  31. Yusuf, R. R., Rahayu, N. S., Nugroho, A., & Khaerunnisa, D. (2023). Peningkatan Sistem Merit Melalui Manajemen Pengembangan Kompetensi Terintegrasi Berbasis Teknologi Informasi di Pemerintah Kabupaten Garut. SWARNA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(4), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.55681/swarna.v2i4.476
  32. Yusuf, R. R., Asropi, A., & Azizah, N. S. (2023). Implementasi Birokrasi Digital di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Tanda Tangan Elektronik di Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Barat. Dinamika Governance: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 12(4/Januari).