Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how far civil servants' digital literacy contributes to the public sector's digital transformation by examining various factors of sharing knowledge concept, such as willingness to learn, willingness to share, and digital transformation. This study employs a mixed-methods approach. The quantitative approach relies on an online survey of 125 local civil servants. A qualitative approach was used with in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with civil servants in Jakarta, West Java, and Yogyakarta provinces. The data gathered was then analyzed using the regression technique. The results of the study show that willingness to learn and willingness to share have no effect on the impact of digital transformation. This is supported by qualitative data, which shows that regulation is the most important factor, followed by increasing efforts to equip ASN in all generations with stronger digital skills.
Keywords: Skill Gap, Digital Transformation literacy, Willingness to Share, Willingness to Learn

Keywords

Skill Gap Digital Transformation literacy Willingness to Share Willingness to Learn

Article Details

References

  1. Asropi, Silitonga, M. S., & Indriyani, D. (2022). How can I Connect? the Link between Flexible Work Arrangements and Inter-organizational Networks (Case study: Indonesian Civil Service). Jurnal Borneo Administrator: Media Pengembangan Paradigma dan Inovasi Sistem Administrasi Negara Volume 18 No 1.
  2. Bertelsmann Foundation and the AOL Time Warner. (2002). 21st century literacy summit: white paper. Bertelsmann.
  3. Bank, W. (2020). The Promise of Education in Indonesia. Washington: World Bank.
  4. B, V. d., & A., d. R. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context - the influence of organisational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.
  5. Gilster, P. (2017). Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Publications.
  6. Haynes, B. (2011). The impact of generational differences on the workplace. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 98-108.
  7. Hilbert, M. (2014). The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014. Telecommunication Policy, Elsevier, 40(6), 567-581.
  8. Hon, A. H., H.Y, A., Fung, P.Y, C., Senbeto, & L, D. (2021). Willingness to share or not to share? Understanding the motivation mechanism of knowledge sharing for hospitality workforce. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management.
  9. Informatika, K. K. (2020). Survei Literasi Digital Indonesia. Jakarta: Kemkominfo.
  10. Indriyani, D., & Solihati, K. D. (2020). An Overview of Indonesian’s Challenging Future: Management of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 564, 279-284.
  11. Robinson, J. P., DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2003). New Social Survey Perspectives on the Digital Divide. IT & Society, 1(2), 1-2.
  12. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. MCB University Press, 9(5).
  13. Martin, A. (2005). DigEULit-a European Framework for Digital Literacy: a Progress Report. Journal of ELiteracy, 2.
  14. Milakovich, M. (2021). Digital Governance Applying Advanced Technologies to Improve Public Service. Routledge.
  15. Mansell, R. (2002). From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies. CurrentSociology, 50(3), 407-426.
  16. OECD. (202). Innovating the Public Sector: From Ideas to Impact. Paris: OECD.
  17. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strat. Manag. J., 17, 27-43.
  18. UNESCO. (2015). Indonesia, literacy for life skills and entrepreneurship: promising EFA practices in the Asia-Pacific region, case study; abridged version. Bangkok: UNESCO Office Bangkok and Regional Bureau for Education in Asia and the Pacific.
  19. Wahyudi, A. A., Widowati, Y. R., & Nugroho, A. A. (2022). STRATEGI IMPLEMENTASI SMART CITY KOTA BANDUNG. Jurnal Good Governance, 18(1).