Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 30, 2018
Published
November 30, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1913 Download : 9320

Main Article Content

Abstract

Economic benefits are increasingly seen as important in the relations of two States. Economic diplomacy is understood here as a factor supporting the increasing bilateral trade and investment between the two countries. The law has evolved to support the activities of countries to achieve their national goals. This paper does not use descriptive techniques to illustrate the superiority of diplomatic programs and the performance of foreign ministries in carrying out diplomatic programs. Economic diplomacy as an instrument has been used by Indonesia to improve its export performance to partner countries this is because Indonesia is increasingly dependent on the international market, not only the average ratio of exports to GDP is increasing, but also the average import ratio that shows increase. Diplomacy is also useful to boost cooperation opportunities in order to open markets for food and agricultural products. Indonesia's diplomatic performance has shown strengthening, both in bilateral, regional and multilateral terms. The subsequent multilateral and regional diplomacy efforts to be undertaken by Indonesia should continue to be strengthened by strong bilateral diplomacy.Keywords:Economic diplomacy, multilateral diplomacy, foreign policy

Article Details

References

  1. Anggrainy, V. S. (2014). Perlindungan Pengungsi Lintas Batas Negara Di
  2. Indonesia Menurut Hukum Internasional. Lex Et Societatis, 2 (1).
  3. Basri, F., & Putra, G. A. (2002). Escaping the middle income trap in Indonesia.
  4. Broto, M. F. (2015). Kerja Sama Luar Negeri Oleh Pemerintahan Daerah
  5. Menghadapi MEA 2015 (Kajian Konsep Paradiplomasi Dalam
  6. Khasanah Ilmu Pemerintahan).
  7. Dixon, M., McCorquodale, R., & Williams, S. (2011). Cases and materials on international law. Oxford University Press.
  8. Djelantik, S. (2008). Diplomasi antara teori dan Praktik. Graha Ilmu.
  9. Elisabeth, A. (Ed.). (2015). Grand Design:Kebijakan Luar Negeri
  10. Indonesia (2015-2025). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
  11. Mungkasa, O. (2011). Desentralisasi dan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia:Konsep, Pencapaian dan Agenda Kedepan. Decentralization and Regional Autonomy in Indonesia:Concept, Achievement, and Future Agenda.
  12. Piper, N. (2015). Democratising migration from the bottom up:The rise of the
  13. global migrant rights movement. Globalizations, 12 (5), 788-802.
  14. Pramudyo, A. (2014). Mempersiapkan Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia
  15. dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN Tahun 2015. Jurnal
  16. Bisnis Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 2 (2).
  17. Redjeki, R., & Setyowati, E. (2016, November). Diplomasi Ekonomi
  18. Kadin Jawa Tengah Dalam Meningkatkan Perdagangan Luar Negeri 2011-2012. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional INDOCOMPAC.
  19. Siswoko, K. H. (2017). Tekanan Global Dalam Penundaan Eksekusi Terpidana Mati Di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi, 8 (2), 179-186.
  20. Somantri, G. R. (2010). Memahami metode kualitatif. Makara Hubs-Asia,
  21. (3).
  22. Starke, J.G, 1972. Introduction to Internastional Law, Sevendition:Nijhoff Martin
  23. Sudirman, S. (2014). Kedudukan Presiden Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan
  24. Presidensial. Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, 1 (1).
  25. Suryokusumo,1995.Hukum Diplomatik teori dan kasus, Bandung Alumi
  26. Syahmin, A. K. (2008). Hukum diplomatik dalam kerangka studi analisis. Rajawali Pers.
  27. Tahamata, 2011.Suaka Diplomatik Dalam Kajian Hukum Internasional.Jurnal Sasi Vol.17 No.2. hlm. 2.
  28. Umar, H. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian. Gramedia Pustaka Umum, Jakarta.
  29. Wardhana, W. (2016). Poros Maritim:Dalam Kerangka Sejarah
  30. Maritim Dan Ekonomi Pertahanan. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 18
  31. (3), 51-68.