Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 13, 2018
Published
November 13, 2018
Download
Unduh
Statistic
Read Counter : 303 Download : 76

Main Article Content

Abstract

This case study is intended to describe the inter-level learning process at the Bererod Gratia Credit Union (CUBG) Jakarta and its characteristics based on the concept of inter-level learning in the organization and oriented to the strategic renewal developed by Crossan, Lane, and White (1999), which are learning between individual, group, and organizational levels through 4I: Intuiting, Interpreting, Integrating, Institutionalizing. Also described are the implications of organizational learning on corporate governance. The study was conducted on learning in solving problems of negative results case in the Bintaro Service Place (TP) and loan decisions that must involve the Head Office. Key informants consist of credit staff, Head of Office, and Committee members at Bintaro TP and General Manager at Head Office. The results show that the inter-level learning process in CUBG has a dynamic balance between learning for innovation and change (exploration) with learning for standardization for management certainty (exploitation). Learning is also holistic and includes single-loop learning to triple-loop learning. One important implication of corporate governance is the increasingly entrenched culture of check and balances at various levels of the organization. Communication centrality in learning requires the development of generative change capabilities at every level of the organization to ensure the continuity of transformation is in balance with the development of governance to maintain organizational integrity.Keywords: Organizational Learning; Inter-level Learning, Corporate Governance

Article Details

References

  1. Bello, D. A. 2005. The Role of Cooperative Societies in Economic Development. MPRA Paper No. 23161, posted 9. June 2010. Online at http://mpra.ub.uni- muenchen.de/23161/.
  3. Crossan, M.M. & Berdrow, I. 2003. Organizational Learning and Strategic Renewal. Strategic Management Journal, Nov. 2003; 24, 11; ABI/INFORM Global. pp. 1087-1105.
  4. Crossan, M.M., Lane, H.W., & White, R.E. 1999. An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. Academy of Management Review, V ol. 24. No. 2, pp. 522-537.
  5. Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M. & Nicolini, D. 2000. Organizational learning: Debates past, present, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783-796.
  6. Fiol, C.M. & Lylies, M.A. 1985. Organizational Learning. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, 803- 813.
  7. Lane, D. & Maxfield, R. 1996). Strategy under complexity: Fostering generative relationships. Long Range Planning, V ol. 29, Elsevier ltd. pp. 215-231.
  8. Levitt, B., March, J.G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 14, pp. 319-340. Stanford University.
  9. Marquardt, M. 1996. Building the Learning Organization: A System Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success. New Y ork: McGraw-Hill.
  10. Marquardt, M. & Reynolds, A. 1994. The Global Learning Organization. New York: Richard D. Irwin.
  11. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Los Angeles: SAGE Pub., Inc.
  12. Nafei, W.A. 2015. Organizational Learning and Organizational Performance: A Correlation Study in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. American International Journal of Social Science, Vol. 4, No. 2; April 2015. Pp 191 – 208.
  13. Nonaka, I. 1991. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69 (6), 96–104.
  14. Popova-Nowak, I.V. & Cseh, M. 2015. The knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682370. 2009.00257.
  15. Schreider, C. 2015. Organizational Learning- The Boost to Organizational Performance: An Organizational Development Assessment amongst Austrian Business Entities. Journal of WEI Business and Economics-August 2015, Volume 4, Number 2.
  16. Senge, P.M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Century.
  17. Song, J. H., Jeung, C., & Cho, S.H. 2011. The impact of the learning organization environment on the organizational learning process in the Korean business context. The Learning Organization, V ol. 18, No. 6, pp. 468-485.
  18. Wiseman, E. 2007. The institutionalism of Organizational Learning: A Neoisntitutional Perspective. In Proceedings of OLKC 2007 – “Learning Fusion.â€