Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 25, 2020
Accepted
January 25, 2020
Published
January 25, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1322 Download : 928

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine how impact of the agricultural input subsidy on farmer terms of trade in Indonesia. This study used a quantitative approach with survey method on time series data of each variable analyzed. Research variables were seed subsidy, fertilizer subsidy, paddy yield and farmer terms of trade. The data used are secondary data from 2009-2015. The analytical method employed was path analysis was applied to the analysis of the national data. The results of path analysis showed that at the national level, seed subsidies affect NTP negatively. Fertilizer subsidies analysis at the national level, also showed negative affect on NTP.Keywords: seed subsidy, fertilizer subsidy, productivity, farmer terms of trade, path analysis

Article Details

References

  1. Ansari et al. (2014). Distributional Consequences of Subsidy Removal from Agricultural and Food Industry Sectors in Iran: A Price-based SAM Analysis. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. Vol. 16: 1-18
  2. Bappenas (2014). Analisis Rumah Tangga, Lahan, dan Usaha Pertanian di Indonesia: Sensus Pertanian 2013. Jakarta: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
  3. Bappenas (2011). Laporan Kajian Strategis Kebijakan Subsidi Pertanian Yang Efektif, Efisien dan Berkeadilan. Jakarta: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional
  4. BPS (2016). Statistik Nilai Tukar Petani 2015. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  5. Chang, K., Lin, W., Lee, T., & Chung, K. (2011). Subsidy programs on diffusion of solar water heaters: Taiwan’s experience. Energy Policy, 39(2), 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.021
  6. Contreras, D., Gómez-lobo, A., & Palma, I. (2018). Revisiting the distributional impacts of water subsidy policy in Chile: a historical analysis from 1998 – 2015. Water Policy, 20, 1208–1226. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2018.073
  7. Darwis, V dan Supriyati. (2014). Subsidi Pupuk : Kebijakan, Pelaksanaan, dan Optimalisasi Pemanfaatannya. Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian.
  8. Gulati, Ashok dan Sharma, A. (1995). Subsidy Syndrome in Indian Agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 30, No. 39 (Sep. 30, 1995), pp. A93-A102
  9. Hendrawan et al. (2011). Analisis Kebijakan Subsidi Pupuk: Penentuan Pola Subsidi dan Sistem Distribusi Pupuk di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis. Vol. 8 No. 2, Oktober 2011: 85-96.
  10. Holden, S. T., & Lunduka, R. W. (2013). Who Benefit from Malawi ’ s Targeted Farm Input Subsidy Program ? Forum for Development Studies, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2012.688858
  11. Juniarsih et al. (2013). Dampak Kebijakan Subsidi Benih Jagung Terhadap Peningkatan Produksi dan Pendapatan Petani di Propinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Program Studi Agribisnis. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Hasanuddin
  12. Jixiu, H., Wei, Z., Haofeng, H., & Hongzhi, G. (2009). Calculating Model of Urban Public Transit Subsidy. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 9(2), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-6672(08)60051-3
  13. Kapindo, Ridwan K. (2011). Analisis Pengaruh Subsidi Pupuk, Kredit Pangan, dan Pengeluaran Pemerintah atas Infrastruktur terhadap Ketahanan Pangan Jawa Tengah. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
  14. Kasiyati, Sri. (2010). Analisis Dampak Subsidi Harga Pupuk Terhadap Output Sektor Produksi Dan Tingkat Pendapatan Rumah Tangga di Jawa Tengah (Pendekatan Analisis I-O dan SNSE Jawa Tengah Tahun 2004). Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
  15. Kim, H., Byun, S., & Park, M. (2004). Mobile handset subsidy policy in Korea: historical analysis and evaluation. Telecommunications Policy, 28, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2003.11.001
  16. Laksana, Iswira. (2004). Dampak Subsidi Pupuk terhadap Kesejahteraan Petani (Studi Kasus: Pupuk Urea). Tesis Magister Perencanaan dan Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
  17. Manaf, D.R.S. (2000). Pengaruh Subsidi Harga Pupuk terhadap Pendapatan Petani: Analisis Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi. Tesis Program Pascasarjana. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
  18. Mayrowani, Henny. (2008). Evaluasi Kebijakan Subsidi Benih Jagung Kasus Kabupaten Jeneponto, Sulawesi Selatan. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. Volume 6 No. 3, September 2008: 256-271.
  19. Novianti. (2012). Dampak Kebijakan Subsidi Pupuk pada Sektor Tanaman Bahan Makanan di Kota Bogor terhadap Output, Pendapatan, dan Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  20. Nurmohamedn and Ashraf. (2016). Agricultural Subsidies: These Still Exist?. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics. Vol.5, Issue 3, 09-17 9
  21. Nurseto, Tejo. (2012). Pengaruh Subsidi Pupuk, Kredit Pertanian dan Inflasi Terhadap Ketahanan Pangan di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  22. Rakhmawati, Tina. (2013). Analisis Efektivitas Kebijakan Subsidi Pupuk dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Padi (Studi Kasus Desa Hambaro, Kecamatan Nanggung, Kabupaten Bogor). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  23. Rizov et al. (2013). CAP Subsidies and the Productivity of EU Farms. Factor Markets Working Paper. No. 37, March 2013, Brussels
  24. Skreli et al. (2015). The impact of government subsidies on the olive and vineyard sectors of Albanian agriculture. Studies in Agricultural Economics. Vol 117, 119-125
  25. Sudjono, Spudnik. (2011). Sistem Subsidi Pupuk Berbasis Relationship: Kajian Penyempurnaan Penyaluran Subsidi Pupuk kepada Petani. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. Volume 9 No. 4, Desember 2011: 313-330.
  26. Susila, Wayan R. (2010). Kebijakan Subsidi Pupuk: Ditinjau Kembali. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 29(2), 2010: 43-49
  27. Wossen, T., & et al. (2017). Productivity and Welfare Effects of Nigeria’s e-Voucher- Based Input Subsidy Program. World Development, 97, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.021