Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 25, 2020
Accepted
January 25, 2020
Published
January 25, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 638 Download : 1017

Main Article Content

Abstract

Gaps in biodiversity conservation management within the Conservation Area that are the responsibility of the central government and outside the Conservation Areas or as the Essential Ecosystems Area (EEA) which are the authority of the Regional Government, have caused various spatial conflicts between wildlife /wild plants and land management activities. Several obstacles faced by the Local Government to conduct its authority to manage (EEA), caused the number and area of EEA determined by the Local Government to be still low. At present only 703,000 ha are determined from the 67 million ha indicated by EEA. This study aims to overview biodiversity conservation policies by local governments and company perceptions in implementing conservation policies and formulate strategies for optimizing the role of Local Governments. From the results of this study, there has not been found any legal umbrella for the implementation of Law number 23/ 2014 related to the conservation of important ecosystems in the regions. This regulatory vacuum leaves the local government in a dilemma for continuing various conservation programs. By using a SWOT to the internal strategic environment and external stratetegic environment of the Environment and Forestry Service, Bengkulu Province , as well as using an analysis of company perceptions of the conservation policies regulatary , this study has been formulated a “survival strategy†through collaboration between the Central Government, Local Governments and the Private Sector to optimize the role of Local Government’s to establish EEA in the regions.Keywords: Management gaps, Essential Ecosystems Area (EEA), Conservation Areas, SWOT analysis and perception analysis

Article Details

References

  1. Direktorat Bina Pengeloaan Ekosistem Esensial. 2018. Profil Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial. Kementerian Kehutanan dan Lingkungan Hidup.
  2. Forum Kolaborasi Kawasan Ekosistem Esensial Koridor Gajah Provinsi Bengkuu, 2018. Rencana Pengelolaan KEE Koridor Gajah Sumatera Lansekap Seblat Provinsi Bengkulu 2018 -2020. Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Povinsi Bengkulu.
  3. Hernawan, Endang. 2018. Inovasi Kebijakan Konservasi Tuntong Laut (Batagur borneoensis) di Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang. Bogor. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  4. Supriatna, Jatna. 2018. Konservasi Biodiversitas. Teori dan Praktek di Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. Jakarta.
  5. Kementerian Kehutanan dan Kementerian Kelutan dan Perikanan, 2010. Analisis Kesenjangan Keterwakilan Ekologis Kawasan Konservasi di Indonsia. Kementerian Kehutanan.
  6. Kementrian KLHK, Bappenas dan LIPI, 2015. Indonesian Bioidiversity. Strategy and Action Plan (IBSAP)2015-2020 . Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
  7. Konsorsium Revisi HCV Toolkit Indonesia. 2008. Panduan Identifikasi Kawasan Bernilai Konservasi Tinggi di Indonesia. Tropenbos International Indonesia Programme.
  8. LIPI, Kementrian KLHK dan BAPPENAS, 2014. Kekinian Keanekaragaman Hayati 2014. LIPI Press.
  9. Mangopo, Edy.2009. Kebijakan Pemerintah Pusat di Bidang Konservasi dari Perspektif Daerah dan Masyarakat. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
  10. Nurhayati, Sri. 2010. Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya dalam Kerangka Desentralisasi. Setjen DPR RI.
  11. Rangkuti, Freddy. 2018. Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis Analisis SWOT. Kompas Gramedia, Jakarta.
  12. Sugiono, 2013. Statistik untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta. Bandung.